A Scalawag

Highland County, Virginia

By Tommy Airey, re-posted from his weekly Substack newsletter

In the months after police murdered George Floyd in Minneapolis, I joined counter-protesters at the “White Lives Matter” rally in front of the pier in Huntington Beach, a former sundown town in Southern California. One of the white men who mattered was toting a two-story pole with three flags: the stars-and-stripes, the 18th century “Don’t Tread on Me” rattlesnake and a “Trump 2020: No More Bullshit” banner. He wore a shirt that said, “I stand for the flag and kneel for the cross.”

As I digested his message, I scrolled through all the memory verses stored away in the recesses of my post-evangelical mind. The only passage in the bible that even remotely resembles kneeling for the cross is in the second chapter of Philippians.

The verse from Paul’s letter to a little house church in the Roman colony says that in the name of Jesus, every knee shall bow and every tongue shall confess that Jesus is lord. Context matters. The passage subverts the patriotic supremacy of its day. Back then, every knee bowed to Caesar and every tongue confessed that Caesar was lord.

The first Christians pledged allegiance to Something Else.

Continue reading “A Scalawag”

The Oscillating, Incubating, Jousting-and-Composting Mystery of Deep Dark

By Jim Perkinson, a ten-year retrospective on Radical Discipleship

What has significantly changed – in the world and in yourself? What/Who has inspired you or brought you hope? What are the forms of supremacy that you’ve struggled to break rank with?

So, yes, ten years from Obama through Trump to Biden and now looking the rump of the nation straight in the eye! But it ain’t about the leadership as much as the dealership.  The global grip of corporate armature and billionaire priority and militant supremacy grows apace.  The Elon Musk flush of political theater with digital warp and AI belches of algorithmic inanity seems virtually (!) unstoppable in the short term. In service overwhelmingly—though not exclusively—of white delusion and confusion that pallor is somehow valor and value, rather than weaponized trauma coming out of the European Middle Ages outfitted with a new weapons technology and an old lie! 

What has changed in the world is perhaps Time itself—or at least our relationship to it.  The onslaught of a pillaging of the more-than-human world into a technological commodification hell bent on re-engineering seemingly everything grabbable on the planetary surface into a human prosthesis, global in extent, accelerating in pace, arguably exercised by a hyperventilating “more” and “faster” that has no imaginable containment other than a resounding “Halt” trumpeted by a no-longer-patient biosphere speaking in the key of climate extremity.

What has changed in me is a night-sky shift towards the oscillating, incubating, jousting-and-composting Mystery of deep dark running from the planetary core to the astral holes centering galaxies and the song that reverberates between. In grief, I lament the loss of half of human life to the dragon’s tail (Rev 12:1) of light-pollution sweeping almost all the stars from urban vision looking for ancestral constellation and consolation above the flickering glow of now.  But then NASA has recently hipped us to a new recognition that Black Holes actually “sing,” echoing a B-flat vibe 57 octaves below middle C in a frequency wave 10 million years long, holding on tune for 2 billion years across that orange hazed horizon. So, thus: the Beauty that is—whether I can see it or not! Irreducibly in motion in complexities of gift-economy reciprocation so far beyond our ken that we fill entire blackboards with equations that “explain” something less than 4 % of all that is (chalking the rest up to “Dark Energy” and “Dark Matter”)! 

And no surprise then that I still mark my deepest education as an on-going, 40-year baptism in another kind of “Beautiful Blackness” on Detroit’s east side streets, now being rhizomically linked with Native savvy and syncopation here in Anishinaabe smarts about Great Lakes water-wisdom. That combination is complemented by continuous learning (from my wife) of indigenous Ayta resilience on the sides of Pinatubo’s eruptive divinity.  And schooled by such, I am propelled back along my own ancestral root, to Celt and Nordic colloquies with Indo-European-profundities dating to pre-Roman humility still rooted in being taught-by our more-than-human kin before such was warped and decimated by imperial domination and rapacity.

So, the supremacy at issue?  A three-fold iteration across 5,000 years of elaboration, beginning in Mesopotamian re-organization of smaller-scale lifeways (hunting-and-gathering, subsistence cultivation, village-based pastoralism) into city-state coercion of labor, surplus extraction, imposed taxation, debt, drudgery, and disease evisceration.  Gradually elites began to assemble armatures of trade, technology, and architecture that effectively removed and buffered them from hands-on exchange with plants and animals in elevating themselves figuratively and literally out of reciprocal relations with such, to a controlling, plundering, and decimating accumulation of goods and status whose brutality was destined to be promoted and gaslighted ever after as “civilization” (built on the Latin word “civis” for male-propertied “citizen” players in in the on-going pillage).

Some 3,000 years down the road, that elite-anchored “species supremacy” insisting humans alone had status and worth, gave rise to its most potent religious offspring in the form of Christian supremacy, warping and re-configuring a Galilean back-to-the-land movement seeking to enflesh ancient Sabbath and Jubilee traditions of eco-reciprocity and co-communion into a monopolistic privatization of “truth” and of Earth itself.  This led after more than a millennium to Doctrine of Christian Discovery genocide (95% on average) of Native Turtle islanders and enslavement of African peoples as tools of produce and wealth assemblage on the stolen land.  Yes, in USA self-conceit—going underground and toxic as the spiritual underpinning of a newly-articulated visual regime of white-skin power and predation.  This still regnant supremacy continues to vaunt Euro-heritage and visage over all else, even as it remains ideologically and artifactually entwined with the civilizational and religious supremacies it (supposedly) superseded. 

And thus we face today, a biospheric blowback ripping the facade off the entire enterprise that will not much longer tolerate the evident fatuity and stupidity.  Inspiration towards life and “ways of being” otherwise—in the face of such—for me is a question of track record.  Who has the proven experience of living in place over generations without destroying either themselves or everyone and everything else in that place and without having to reach beyond that particular bioregional bounty to plunder an “elsewhere”?  The simple answer to such is “indigeneity” and ancestry.  How re-learn what they knew and know? And once again, become worthy recipients of—because co-participants with—such amazing Beauty and Magnificence as Life on this planet yet represents and obviously is.

Underdog Insurgence, Whose On First?: Deciding Priority Between Jewish Right, Pagan Wit, or Canine Bites and Barks?

By Jim Perkinson (above), a sermon for St. Peter’s Episcopal Church (Detroit, MI)

And he said to her, “Let the children first be fed, for it is not right to take the children’s bread and throw it to the dogs.” (Mk 7:27)

Note, right up front, how rapidly the subject shifts topic in this Marcan vignette. It goes from unclean spirit to bread to puppies and argues about priorities.  Pretty easy for somebody eclectic like me to open up, in response, a fire hydrant of ideas without any hoses attached.  So, my title is an attempt to organize the flow a bit. We begin (ha!) with the word “first.”

The sacred Jewish writing known as the Talmud (Brachot 40a) asserts: “It is forbidden for people to eat before they give food to their animals as it says (Dvarim 11:15), ‘I will provide grass in your field for your cattle’ and only then does the verse state ‘and you will eat and be satisfied’” (Rav Yehuda, teaching in the name of Rav, quoted by Halickman)[1]

But, but then in the Gospel of Mark today (as we read), Rabbi Jesus says: “Let the children first be fed; it is not right to take the children’s bread and throw it to the dogs” (Mk 7: 27).

And those “buts” (plus a bunch more) will be central in the riff to follow here—one thing going one way, and then suddenly the same thing going another way, or even a line of anatomy curving around against itself and in “cheeky” fashion, doing so twice.  There are buts and then there are “butts.” As we shall note.

Continue reading “Underdog Insurgence, Whose On First?: Deciding Priority Between Jewish Right, Pagan Wit, or Canine Bites and Barks?”

God Calls a Remnant

By Rev. Dr. Nick Peterson, Professor of Homiletics and Worship at Christian Theological Seminary in Indianapolis. In his work, Nick explores how black faith engenders intramural care practices, which he calls “black-on-black care” – a transformative care that contends with and sometimes exceeds the constraints of antiblackness. Rev. Dr. Peterson offered this up to celebrate the 10-year anniversary of RadicalDiscipleship.net.

I traffic in primarily liberal Protestant circles where discipleship often gets a bad rap, largely due to its association with evangelical circles whose theologies frequently oppose liberation and inclusion. Still, I think it’s important not to abandon the idea or concept to its popular usage, but rather to recognize its potential to sow the seeds of God’s will on earth as it is in heaven.

We all know that Jesus called and chose his disciples—like any good rabbi, he wanted to select people who could carry forward his teachings and his orientation toward life and God’s purpose in the world. The thing is, Jesus didn’t seem particularly selective about whom he chose, or at least that’s how the gospels tell it. He was simply walking along and called men as he encountered them, and, across the board, they stopped what they were doing to follow him. These were not generally men trained in the specifics of Jewish law or religious practice. They were not of noble birth or high standing, with few exceptions. Still, Jesus chose to give the best of himself to a group of ordinary, everyday people.

Jesus calls disciples who will follow. And that’s the challenge, because following Jesus doesn’t necessarily make the path any clearer. The road of discipleship does not lead to easy living; in fact, it leads to a radical disposition. This disposition confronts suffering, pain, neglect, and oppression with truth, words of hope, and life itself. The discipline of discipleship is less about having the right answers or being a superb apologist, and more about being willing to witness pain that we’d rather not see—and remaining bold enough to believe and wait for God to show up in it.

The radical call of discipleship remains a daunting proposition because Jesus ultimately chose to show his greatest power by entering into death and waiting with it until even death surrendered to God’s purposes. The world we inhabit is death-dealing as well, because of the evil born of human hands. From our children killing each other at school and at play, to our dollars funding the bombing of children thousands of miles away—death has become a universal currency. And in the face of this, God calls a remnant, raises a witness in the world, to remind us that this is not how we are meant to live.

The ubiquity of violence and death can be so overwhelming that it may feel like our labor and waiting are meaningless. This feeling is amplified by the pressure to make a large impact, to equate witness with notoriety or platform. But God’s call has never been about winning on the world’s terms or even on our own terms. God does not call disciples to play and win the game of domination. God calls disciples to lavish love on the world until Love wins. God calls disciples to pour out mercy and grace on the neglected and the maligned, like water on thirsty ground. God calls disciples to a steadfastness that does not confuse urgency with anxiety or inclusion with passivity. The radical call of God is like the wind of the Spirit, moving where it will, connecting inspired breaths across time and space.

For the gift of the invitation to follow, we give thanks. For those whose footprints reveal new paths in this journey, we give thanks. Thank you, radical disciples, for nurturing this oasis in a dry land.

What a Difference a Decade Can Make

By Wes Howard-Brook, the author of several books, including Empire Baptized: How the Church Embraced What Jesus Rejected

A decade ago, I was teaching Bible and theology full-time at our local Jesuit school, Seattle University. Now I am retired.

A decade ago, my wife and ministry partner, Sue, were part of our local Mennonite congregation.
Now, we do not attend church.

A decade ago, I identified as a Christian.
Now, I have reclaimed my birth identity as a Jew who loves the Jewish Jesus.

A decade ago, Sue and I were in the midst of an eighteen year stretch of hosting and leading a Scripture group that met every Thursday for two hours in our living room.
Now, it is hosted elsewhere.

There are many reasons for these changes, some which we all share—the pandemic, for instance—and others that are personal to my own journey. But as a result of these choices, I now am experiencing life much differently than I was a decade ago.

Continue reading “What a Difference a Decade Can Make”

Ten Years.

Today is the ten-year anniversary of our first post on Radical Discipleship. It’s been a whole decade of platforming expressions of Christian faith committed to breaking rank with supremacy of every form.

When we started, folks were still marching in Ferguson, in the aftermath of the murder of Michael Brown.

Since then, we’ve become unstitched. Which is another way to say we are getting free.

The cover has come off.

We are staying awake.

We are bearing witness.

Continue reading “Ten Years.”

The Origins of Modern Zionism

This is Zachary Foster’s response to a tweet from Emily Schrader that said, “I’m not sure why this needs to be said, but we don’t need non-Jews to be lecturing Jews about what Zionism is or isn’t.” Foster is a Jewish-American historian of Palestine who received his PhD in Near Eastern Studies from Princeton in 2017.

Of course, Christians don’t need to be lecturing Jews about anything. We have our own intramural issues – and Christian Zionism is a big one that heavily influences conservative and liberal followers of Jesus.

Zionism was initially a Christian phenomenon before it was a Jewish phenomenon.

→ Anthony Cooper (Lord Shaftesbury) (1801-1885) published a tract in 1838 claiming that Jewish “restoration” in Palestine would benefit Great Britain’s geopolitical position and would hasten the second coming of Jesus.

→ Charles Henry Churchill (1807-1867) proposed a plan for establishing a Jewish state in Palestine in the 1840s as British Consul in Damascus.

→ James Finn (1806-1872), British Consul in Jerusalem, member of the London Society for Promoting Christianity Amongst the Jews, bought land in the 1850s in the Palestinian village of Artas for the purpose of employing destitute Jews there.

→ James Bicheno’s (1880) “The restoration of the Jews, the crisis of all nations”: purpose to “stir up public attention to the prophecies which relate to the restoration of this singular people in the latter days.”

→ William Hechler an Anglican clergyman in 1884 wrote “The Restoration of the Jews to Palestine” in which he argued that Jewish settlement in Palestine was a precondition for the return of Jesus.

Maybe the more sensible question is, why did Jews hijack the idea of Zionism from non-Jews?

Sources: Ilan Pappe, Lobbying for Zionism; Masalha, The Zionist Bible

This Sweet Earth

Today we celebrate the recent release of a new book by Lydia Wylie-Kellermann, the co-founder of RadicalDiscipleship.net! You can order This Sweet Earth right here. We were fortunate enough to have the opportunity to ask her a few questions about it. See below for book tour dates!

RD: We are interested in what led you to write this book. Are there specific experiences or situations that you can go back to that told you that this book needed to be written and that you needed to write it?

LWK: I think more than anything I had this ongoing nagging feeling for a few years that there was this book inside of me. I just needed to make space to see what would pour out.

A big part of why I personally needed this book was because I was shocked by the level of immobilizing anxiety I was experiencing. I was reading scientific studies that kept saying how much worse things are than we thought. I was witnessing predictions for human extinction. The doomsday scrolling was making it hard to breathe. There was so much grief and rage stuck in my body all the time. And I don’t think I’m alone in that. I realized that if I held these feelings by myself that they would turn either towards total despair or I would have to pretend it wasn’t happening just to keep going.

Yet I know that this rage and grief and anxiety are holy. They are how we express how much we love this world. And that if we hold these emotions in community, then there is beautiful, transformational power in it all.

When I was overcome with pain around climate crisis, it was my kids that would grab my hand and pull me over to watch the caterpillar devouring the milkweed. Their ability to slow down and intimately rest in this ecosystem changed my posture.

And as I look out into the future and what I want my kids to know and learn, I find myself leaning on the theological imagination and political analysis of my childhood. My parents and the community around me taught me so much about what it means to be human….what we say yes to with our whole bodies and how we also say no by putting our bodies on the line.

This book in many ways is a love letter to the generations before me and the generations after. I am constantly stumbling over gratitude for the lessons they teach me daily.

Continue reading “This Sweet Earth”

Genocide: Absent from the Title, Marginalized in the Body

A stunning open letter from Kairos Palestine in response to this letter from the Word Council of Churches last month. This is an invaluable resource for liberal Christians who painfully continue to “both sides” this decades-long oppressive situation. [RD.net bolded portions below for our own emphasis]

Open letter to the Executive Committee of the World Council of Churches 

”But based on his promise, we wait for new heavens and a new earth, where righteousness dwells.”  (2 Peter 3:13)

Esteemed Members of the Executive Committee,

We at Kairos Palestine extend our appreciation of your statement issued in Bogota, Colombia by your esteemed Committee (6-11 June) titled: ”THE ESCALATING CRISIS IN GAZA”. We trust that the statement was issued with great concern and with the urgent need to terminate the atrocious crimes in Gaza.

However, as Palestinians, as Christians and as your partners, we would like to bring to your attention the following points pertaining to the content and the calls included in the statement:

1- We believe that the title ”Escalating Crisis in Gaza” is neither accurate, nor adequate. The protracted ”crisis” is a result of 8 months of Israel’s incessant large-scale military aggression which mounts to acts of genocide, prior to which, Gaza has been strangled by a 17year blockade that forced 2.3 million people to become aid-dependent and extremely vulnerable to famine and starvation. Especially with WCC being one of the key partners of the Office of the UN Special Adviser on the Prevention of Genocide in the drafting of the Plan of Action for Religious Leaders and Actors to Prevent Incitement to Violence that Could Lead to Atrocity Crimes (’the Fez Process’), it holds an elevated responsibility in identifying a genocide, condemning it with the strongest possible terms and acting to end it immediately. Besides our own accounts and meticulous documentation of the genocide as Palestinians, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) did confirm in its provisional measures that Israel’s is plausibly committing genocide. Not only is the term genocide absent from the title, it is marginalized in the body of the statement instead of being the essence of what the statement is condemning and calls for ending immediately. Investigation after investigation concludes that Israel is committing atrocious crimes under international law, including the most recent report[1] by the UN Commission of Inquiry which concluded that Israel is committing the crime of Extermination against the Palestinian people. It cannot be acceptable that crimes of such scale, committed deliberately over 8 months, be narrowed down to a ”crisis”.

Continue reading “Genocide: Absent from the Title, Marginalized in the Body”